Two students, James and John were given a grammar test by their teacher. The question this
"James while John had had had had had had had had had had had a better effect on the teacher" — речення англійською мовою, що демонструє лексичну неоднозначність і необхідність використання розділових знаків, які служать.
Images of James while John had had had had had had had had had had had a better effect on the
"James while John had had had had had had had had had had had a better effect on the teacher "這個英文句子是用來說明用词歧義和标点符号的重要性； 標點符號的作用就是代替口語中的語調、 重音和停頓。 在探討人類如何處理資訊的研究中，常用這句話来說明讀者會借助標點符號來理解句子的意思，尤其在掃讀多行.
James While John Had Had Had Had Had Had Had Had Had Had Had A Better Effect On The Teacher
It should change to "James while John had had had had had had had had had had had a better effect on the teacher" or something which makes sense as a whole. The other homophone articles have titles which do make sense as a whole.170.51.135.191 15:38, 2 May 2009 (UTC) Reply {} to {I changed the markup of the quote..
Two students, James and John were given a grammar test by their teacher. The question was, "is
"James while John had had had had had had had had had had had a better effect on the teacher" is an English sentence used to demonstrate lexical ambiguity and the necessity of punctuation,which serves as a substitute for the intonation, stress, and pauses found in speech.In human information processing research, the sentence has been used to show how readers depend on punctuation to give.
James while John had had had had had had had had had had had a better effect on the teacher
He was helping a friend in college study for her Test of English as a Foreign Language. She was working on past tenses and, sincerely attempting to explain a mistake she'd made, he told her: "If you had had 'had' here, you would have had to have had 'had' there as well." Whereupon she screamed.
James while John had had had had had had had had had had had a better effect on the teacher
James, while John had had "had", had had "had had"; "had had" had had a better effect on the teacher. I completely comprehend the purpose and structure of every part of the sentence.but I just can't wrap my head around the (red)bolded part. It does not make sense to me. At all.
James while John had had had had had had had had had had had a better effect on the teacher
James, while John had had "had", had had "had had"; "had had" had had a better effect on the teacher.(제임스 와일 존 해드 해드 해드 해드 해드 해드 해드 해드 해드 해드 해드 어 베터 이펙트 온 더 티철)은 영어 문법을 이용한 긴 문장이다. 'had'가 11번 연속으로 쓰여 문법적 오류가 있다고 생각될 수도 있지만, 도치를 하고.
Images of James while John had had had had had had had had had had had a better effect on the
James, while John had had "had", had had "had had"; "had had" had had a better effect on the teacher. פירוש המשפט הוא: "ג'יימס, בזמן שג'ון השתמש במילה 'had', השתמש בצירוף המילים 'had had' (לציון past perfect). ל-'had had' הייתה השפעה טובה יותר על המורה".
Stream James, while John had had "had," had had "had had;" "had had" had had a better effect by
"James while John had had had had had had had had had had had a better effect on the teacher" is an English sentence used to demonstrate lexical ambiguity and the necessity of punctuation, which serves as a substitute for the intonation, stress, and pauses found in speech. In human information processing research, the sentence has been used to show how readers depend on punctuation to give.
James while John had had had had had had had had had had had a better effect on the teacher
Since James' answer was right, it had had a better effect on the teacher. The sentence can be understood more clearly by adding punctuation and emphasis: James, while John had had "had", had had "had had"; "had had" had had a better effect on the teacher. There is a similar example that I was already familiar with, "Buffalo.
Grammar puns James writes the correct The man had had a cold, which had had a better effect on
In this video, I look at a sentence that is an example of lexical ambiguity:James while john had had had had had had had had had had had a better effect on t.
Images of James while John had had had had had had had had had had had a better effect on the
#englishiseasywithrb #rajdeepbanerjee ENGLISH GRAMMAR LESSONShttps://www.englishiseasywithrb.com/p/english-grammar-lessons.html?m=1WEEKLY GRAMMAR TESTShttps:.
Be proud of your progress 💖 loveellie Proud of you, Ellie, Yesterday
Why is it "James, while John had had 'had', had had 'had had'; 'had had' had had a better effect on the teacher", and not "James, while John had 'had', had 'had had'; 'had had' had a better effect on the teacher"? 📚 Grammar / Syntax
Had So Much Fun Quotes. QuotesGram
How "James while John had had had had had had had had had had had a better effect on the teacher" is Correct Sentence? Can anyone explain? grammaticality; Share. Improve this question. Follow asked May 19, 2013 at 13:06. vs4vijay vs4vijay. 351 2 2 gold badges 3 3 silver badges 6 6 bronze badges. 7.
English Language Day online presentation
James while John had had had had had had had had had had had a better effect on the teacher. Share. Improve this answer. Follow answered Mar 30, 2011 at 14:06. oosterwal oosterwal. 7,391 6 6 gold badges 34 34 silver badges 48 48 bronze badges. Add a comment | 1 That that is is that that is not is not is that it it is.
James while John had had had had had had had had had had had a better effect on the teacher
"James while John had had had had had had had had had had had a better effect on the teacher"は、多義語の語彙的曖昧性を巧みに表現した英文である。 適切な句読点の位置を探し当て、文の意味を通らせる言葉遊びに使われる 。. 哲学者のハンス・ライヘンバッハは、1947年、対象言語とメタ言語という異なるレベルの.